Tuesday, August 27, 2024

A functionalist explanation of the purchase of the new Nigerian Presidential Airbus A330 Aircraft.

A Structural Functionalist explanation behind the purchase of the new Nigerian Presidential Airbus A330 Aircraft.

By Tom Okure, Ph.D
ICMS, Inc Reports
Date: August 28, 2024

Introduction 

Nigeria's new presidential jet has been trending as a topic, in the regular and social media space. The controversy surrounding the government's decision in favor of purchasing a new and bigger plane stems from the fact that the Nigerian economy is in bad shape. Initially, the government denied making the purchase, but presidential aides laid the foundation and reason to acquire a new plane to add to the existing presidential fleet, noting that the primary plane used by the president for frequent international travel was old, had safety problems, and needed frequent costly repairs. Consequently, presidential aides argued that the old plane which is 19 years old needed to be replaced in favor of a more reliable and adequate plane to convey the president to his frequent international engagements. The 19-year-old smaller presidential jet (Boeing BBJ 737-700) was a brand new aircraft that was bought by former Nigerian president Obasanjo. Suddenly, against the backdrop of previous denials, the Nigerian public was on Monday, August 19, 2024, introduced to Nigeria's new (but used) lavished 160 billion Niara presidential jet, an Airbus A330 Aircraft. Some analysts say the new presidential jet which is so much bigger than any existing plane in the current presidential fleet, will require more expensive operational costs and maintenance.

This article offers a structural-functionalist perspective as an alternative and a better explanation for understanding the policy reasoning behind the controversial purchase of the new Nigerian Airbus A330 Aircraft. Nations act in many ways that defy understanding unless one digs deeper into the unobvious (latent) reasons underpinning their actions. This writer argues that the reason behind the purchase of the new (but used) Nigerian Presidential jet cannot be explained based on the pronouncements of the Tinubu’s aids justifying the purchase, but rather from the latent functions underlying the Nigerian government’s policy decision. This writer argues that the latent function of this new aircraft is symbolic, and prestigious, making the Nigerian government look modern and commensurate with the status of Nigeria as a major oil producer and global leader.

Nigeria's Channels Television
Various expressions of approval and disapproval abound in the social media community. Prominent Nigerians including Ezekwesilli fault the Tinubu administration and the national assembly for making such a ridiculous policy decision to spend such a huge sum of money to buy a plane when the Nigerian population is suffering economic hardship. In the social media space, an X user @Fdmlearn said it wasn’t right that Nigerians were being told to undergo economic pain while the government was buying a new plane for the president. So many citizens appeared very angry and concerned over the government's action, especially because the planes' acquisition and unveiling to the public occurred less than two weeks after thousands of Endbadgovernace protesters had taken to the streets across the country to protest rising hunger and the suffocating high cost of living. One social media critic stated: “Wait so despite the Tinubu-led Government telling Nigerians to bear the economic hardship and wait for a better tomorrow, they were busy paying cash for a new private Jet to add to the presidential fleet that has over 6 aircraft already?”.

President Tinubu was elected in 2023 to head Africa’s most populous country. Since his ascension to power, he has introduced many difficult and unpopular economic reforms, including the removal of fuel subsidies, which have had adverse consequences such as high inflation alleged to be over 30% currently. President Tinubu argues that his reforms are necessary to cut government spending and stimulate long-term growth.

 A Better Understanding of Nigerian Government Policy Decision Making

Why did President Tinubu's administration purchase this controversial and alleged luxurious Airbus A330 Aircraft? The answer to this question is best understood from the perspective of the latent function of this aircraft in the reasoning of the Tinubu administration. Having a big presidential plane represents a kind of latent doctrinal formula or assumption adopted from rich and powerful nations like the United States, China, Japan, Saudi Arabia, etc, a statement of political ideology expected by the international community from an economically powerful and modern nation. The problem here is that the public does not see the whole picture and reasoning behind why African governments do what they do. Opponents of the purchase say that lawmakers did not approve the purchase, because it was not mentioned in this year’s budget. A social media commentator not understanding the latent function of this plane stated: “Let's tell ourselves the truth. Tinubu's new Airbus presidential aircraft purchase for N150 billion at a time of penury, hunger, and want shows how wicked, selfish, self-indulgent, and insensitive to the plight of the average Nigerian he really is.” Another commentator in X (formerly Tweeter) stated in favor by noting @Timi_The_Law "he supports the president’s decision as the plane is not personal but belongs to the office of the president. “Tinubu's decision to buy a new plane is the right one. The plane belongs to the office of the president, and future presidents will enjoy it,” he posted. These statements mirror the manifest function of the Airbus A330 Aircraft as perceived by the administration supporters of the purchase. But are their perspective of the reasoning behind the purchase correct? This writer disagrees.  

It is reasonable to assume that most economically powerful oil-rich OPEC nations are expected to look and act rich; Nigeria is no exception. 

Nigeria's Channels Television
While the Nigerian public may see the actions of the Tinubu administration as selfish, self-indulgent, and insensitive to the plight of the average Nigerian, this writer argues that it is reasonable to conclude that our Nigerian political leaders see themselves as oil-rich and governing a fast economically growing nation seeking to become an industrial nation. The public pronouncements of political leaders echo this vision of becoming a great nation. Our leaders have grandiose economic development plans such as the Lagos Calabar multibillion-dollar coastal highway under construction. As witnessed by Nigeria's counterpart OPEC nations like Dubia and Suadi Arabia, an oil-rich country thinks big and acts big in all its actions. Looking like them, like other oil-rich nations and powerful economic nations like China, Japan, and the United Kingdom (UK) is the guiding principle that properly explains many of the actions of Nigerian policymakers even when they appear wasteful, unaffordable, and insensitive to the suffering of the poor masses.  

The government doesn't see the huge expenditure for this plane as wasteful. In a statement on X, President Tinubu’s media aide Bayo Onanuga said the new plane would actually save money. He noted that “The new plane, bought far below the market price, saves Nigeria huge maintenance and fuel costs, running into millions of dollars yearly,” according to his statement.

According to a BBC news report, "The new presidential jet was recently released to the Nigerian government after it was seized by a Chinese firm, Zhangson Investment Co. Limited, which obtained a Paris court order to seize some Nigerian government assets following an investment dispute with Ogun state in south-west Nigeria." The new (but used) 15-year-old plane is touted to have an elaborate configuration for VIPs and replaces the country’s 19-year-old Boeing BBJ 737-700. The difference in the ages of the new and old planes is four years. It is reasonable to argue that the choice of the new plane is not in its newness, but perhaps rather lies in its huge size and luxurious interior befitting of Nigeria as the giant of Africa. 

From a functionalist perspective, this writer argues that Nigeria's presidency believes that to be considered a modern oil-rich nation it must do big things, and have a big plane with all the elaborate configurations for VIPs. Whether the country’s 19-year-old Boeing BBJ 737-700 that the new presidential jet replaced had safety problems or was expensive to maintain did not feature properly as the policy rationale to replace it. What is very important to understand here is the fact that the 15-year-old new Nigerian presidential plane is symbolic of the expectations of a modern presidential fleet in form, and serves the demands and expectations of the international community which Nigeria is an active part of.  

Concluding Remarks

Screenshot taken from:
News Nations Television 

Facts obtained in media reports show that Nigeria's new presidential jet is not a new plane but a 15-year-old-plus-used plane. This new plane allegedly is supposed to replace the existing 19-year-old smaller presidential jet that has been effectively performing well and in use until recently when presidential aids started feeding the public with news about its safety.

This article has attempted to provide an alternative potential latent unobvious functionalist explanation from mainstream analysis for the Nigerian government's decision to purchase the new Nigerian Airbus A330 Aircraft. This author has argued that Tinubu's administration's action is commensurate with the trend of many other oil-rich nations that have taken similar actions like the Nigerian government to symbolize and show off their wealth and economic power. Nigeria's policymakers believe that this plane is a necessary aspect of Nigeria's development into a powerful economic nation. The writer wonders why the public is surprised about the plane purchase, especially because unknown and unobvious to the public, before the huge investment was secretly made, Presidential aides laid the foundation leading up to the purchase, by justifying the expenditures for it for safety reasons even in the difficult economic circumstances that the country is facing.

____________________________

All rights reserved by Tom Okure, Ph.D. CEO of Inter-Continental Mgt. Systems, Inc. (or ICMS Inc.). ICMS, Inc., is a multifaceted business and management consulting firm with its head office in Albany, New York        

Thursday, June 27, 2024

Commentary on Burkina Faso Military Armaments Build Up: Should ECOWAS and Especially Nigeria be Concerned?

 Should ECOWAS and Nigeria be Concerned with Burkina Faso Military Capacity Build-Up?

Commentary by Tom Okure, Ph.D. for ICMS, Inc 

—————

Burkina Faso is currently headed by President Captain Ibrahim Traoré a military junta that forcefully took control of the country from the government. Ibrahim Traoré who was born on March March 1988, is a Burkinabè military officer who seized power on

President Captain Ibrahim Traoré
September 30, 2022, and installed himself, as the interim leader of Burkina Faso in a coup d'état that ousted interim president Paul-Henri Sandaogo Damiba.

The military regime of Captain Ibrahim Traoré broke ranks with the regional economic block called the Economic Community of West Africa (ECOWAS). Even though peaceful and military threats by ECOWAS to compel Burkina Faso to return to the community have continued, the junta has refused to rejoin ECOWAS. Instead, Captain Ibrahim Traoré has chosen to build up his military capabilities, perhaps to defend itself against a potential ECOWAS invasion or as he claims, to fight terrorists that have been ravaging the country for many years now. The questions posited here are, should ECOWAS and Nigeria be worried about the military diversification and buildup by Burkina Faso? Is the military junta acquisition and flexing of its sophisticated build-up of Turkish drones (including Turkish-built Baykar Bayraktar TB2 unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), Mi-17, Mi-24, and Mi-26 helicopters, etc); Chinese and Egyptian-built armored vehicles, etc acquired recently simply be viewed as a defensive buildup or a preparation for a war he perceives may be eminent in the future. In a recent statement by the military junta in taking delivery of a large quantity of weapons delivery, and handing the weapons over to his veteran's affairs and defense minister, the junta leader Traore emphatically stated: “Remember that we are in a world of predation and to have peace, we must wage war. So, wage war,” 

What can one extrapolate from this “we must wage war” worrisome statement!

Burkina Faso is a landlocked West African country that covers a land mass area of 274,223 km and is bordered by Mali to the northwest, Niger to the northeast, the countries of Benin to the southeast, Togo and Ghana to the south, and Ivory Coast to the southwest. The country gained its independence in 1960 with the name of Upper Volta but later renamed itself in 1984 as Burkina Faso, which means “Land of Incorruptible People”. 

During the past year, the military administration of Burkina Faso has acquired and taken delivery of large quantities of military hardware including new drones and armored vehicles from China,

Turkish Built Drones delivered to Burkina Faso
Turkey, Egypt, etc as it claims to expand its armed forces in the face of relentless terror attacks. But is that the real reason behind the massive military buildup? The military junta leader and President Captain Ibrahim Traoré is continuously increasing his military capabilities by purchasing and taking delivery of all types of hardware including drones, military vehicles of all kinds VP11 and  CS/VP14, armored tanks, and even Caterpillar excavators which he usually hands over to his military chiefs in colorful ceremonies. It is a fact that Burkina Faso has been greatly and adversely impacted by international terrorists trying to gain a permanent foothold in the Western Africa Sahel region.  

Russian President Putin and Ibrahim Traoré. What are they really up to?
In several West African countries, more specifically in the Sahel region, political instability has increased in recent years. Since 2015, the landlocked country of Burkina Faso has been grappling with armed terrorist groups, which have caused over 10,000 casualties and the displacement of over two million of its citizens. This fact and accompanying instability caused two military coups, which resulted in the present junta's rise to power. The military junta of President Captain Ibrahim Traoré is currently aligning itself with Russia as its new partner in its fight against terrorism. Russia on the other hand is using the opportunity to expand its global military power and presence in the Sahel region of West Africa with the help of the likes of President Captain Ibrahim Traoré of Burkina Faso and other military juntas that have recently seized power within the ECOWAS regional economic community to expand its influence. But many other West African countries are also confronting the same territorial incursions into their borders by terrorists. With the pretext of poor and corrupt governance, we have witnessed a surge of military coups within the ECOWAS block over the last few years. What are the global implications of these coups and the realignments by undemocratical coup military leaders with Russia rather than remaining with their colonial partners such as France? Could the arms buildup expand beyond Burkina Faso to its neighbors? Are global powers like Russia and China that want to change the current world order responsible for the unusual build-up of military capacity by the junta of Burkina Faso. Could this be the hidden agenda behind the armaments buildup which appears to go far beyond the fight against terrorism? Can we believe Captain Ibrahim Traore when he states that the new sophisticated equipment in his possession is to be used only to combat terrorism and reinforcement of the operational capabilities of his fighting forces on the ground?
Receiving the delivery of Chinese weapons
Since the coup in 2022 and the 

ECOWAS threat to bring coup-led regimes back to its regional economic block domain by force if necessary, the junta in Burkina Faso especially among the other military juntas in ECOWAS has been intensifying its military diversification efforts and build-up of its offensive capabilities. 

Is ECOWAS and especially Nigeria, ready to take on the growing military presence of Burkina Faso military becoming a regional military power aided by Russia and China? Are we seeing the beginning of a new cold war in the West African Sahel region? Whatever the case, this writer believes that policymakers in the ECOWAS economic community must be vigilant and keep a watchful eye on Burkina Faso’s military muscle flexing? 



____________________________

All rights reserved by Tom Okure, Ph.D. CEO of Inter-Continental Mgt. Systems, Inc. (or ICMS Inc.). ICMS, Inc., is a multifaceted business and management consulting firm with its head office in Albany, New York